Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | arianne | 7-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757 |
Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-1 | None |
Dimir Midrange | hamuda | 6-2 | None |
Dimir Midrange | o_danielakos | 6-3 | None |
Dimir Midrange | kroma_ | 6-3 | None |
5 Color Legends , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange , Dimir Teachings , Esper Reanimator , Grixis Midrange , Sultai Midrange
Ertai Resurrected ranks #342 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 83%).
Multi average: 67.2%
Performance compared to other Multi cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Ertai Resurrected is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 8.72 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 4 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.6%. Ertai Resurrected has a win rate of 69.7%, making it 6.6% worse than other 4-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unholy Annex/Ritual Chamber | Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room | 8 | 68.4% | 1 |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 57 | 61.3% | 21 |
Subterranean Schooner | Artifact — Vehicle | 5 | 60.0% | 1 |
Neutralize the Guards | Instant | 9 | 55.7% | 2 |
Faebloom Trick | Instant | 54 | 54.4% | 10 |
Cryptic Coat | Artifact — Equipment | 7 | 54.2% | 4 |
Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator | Legendary Planeswalker — Kaito | 10 | 51.5% | 0 |
Preacher of the Schism | Creature — Vampire Cleric | 175 | 51.2% | 44 |
Disfigure | Instant | 24 | 49.4% | 9 |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 166 | 49.1% | 44 |
Cards that perform better with Ertai Resurrected than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Faerie Dreamthief | Creature — Faerie Warlock | 1 | 19 | 72.6% | 71.2% | +1.5% |
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse | Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor | 4 | 30 | 73.2% | 71.9% | +1.3% |
Negate | Instant | 2 | 25 | 72.2% | 72.5% | -0.3% |
Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 25 | 69.9% | 70.4% | -0.4% |
Deep-Cavern Bat | Creature — Bat | 2 | 36 | 69.5% | 70.3% | -0.8% |
Phantom Interference | Instant | 1 | 35 | 68.8% | 69.9% | -1.1% |
Dreams of Steel and Oil | Sorcery | 1 | 8 | 69.8% | 71.0% | -1.2% |
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 38 | 69.4% | 70.9% | -1.6% |
Go for the Throat | Instant | 2 | 38 | 69.7% | 71.3% | -1.6% |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 9 | 71.2% | 72.8% | -1.7% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Dimir Midrange | 389 | 18.7% | 53.4% |
Dimir Bounce | 80 | 16.1% | 56.1% |
5 Color Legends | 15 | 79.0% | 40.3% |
Unknown Archetype | 5 | 1.4% | 28.6% |
Unclassified | 5 | 2.5% | 27.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.