Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Orzhov Pixie | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono White Tokens | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Midrange | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Angels | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Orzhov Tokens | ivan_draw_go | 6-1 | None |
| Mono White Tokens | hermanomlg | 6-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Aggro , Azorius Auras , Azorius Bounce , Azorius Control , Azorius Enchantments , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Tempo , Azorius Tokens Control
Meta Performance Analysis
Enduring Innocence ranks #258 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 62%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
White average: 74.6%
Performance compared to other White cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Enduring Innocence is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 14.17 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 3 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.0%. Enduring Innocence has a win rate of 75.2%, making it 1.6% better than other 3-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unidentified Hovership | Artifact — Vehicle | 11 | 78.8% | 7 |
| Metropolis Reformer | Creature — Angel Cleric | 6 | 76.5% | 2 |
| Chimil, the Inner Sun | Legendary Artifact | 5 | 71.8% | 1 |
| Sorcerous Spyglass | Artifact | 8 | 68.8% | 4 |
| Clay-Fired Bricks | Artifact // Artifact | 24 | 66.1% | 12 |
| Kellan, Daring Traveler | Legendary Creature — Human Faerie Scout // Sorcery — Adventure | 7 | 65.6% | 1 |
| Skyknight Squire | Creature — Cat Scout | 24 | 63.7% | 8 |
| Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 62.5% | 3 |
| Elspeth, Storm Slayer | Legendary Planeswalker — Elspeth | 12 | 61.7% | 3 |
| Unstoppable Slasher | Creature — Zombie Assassin | 7 | 57.9% | 4 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Enduring Innocence than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authority of the Consuls | Enchantment | 1 | 8 | 83.3% | 75.5% | +7.8% |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 1 | 6 | 79.4% | 73.5% | +5.9% |
| Split Up | Sorcery | 3 | 6 | 80.8% | 75.9% | +4.9% |
| Nowhere to Run | Enchantment | 2 | 5 | 75.9% | 74.0% | +1.9% |
| Hopeless Nightmare | Enchantment | 1 | 5 | 75.9% | 74.2% | +1.7% |
| Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 2 | 5 | 75.0% | 73.3% | +1.7% |
| Rest in Peace | Enchantment | 2 | 12 | 73.1% | 72.5% | +0.6% |
| Day of Judgment | Sorcery | 4 | 11 | 73.0% | 72.5% | +0.5% |
| Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 8 | 73.5% | 74.8% | -1.3% |
| Overlord of the Mistmoors | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 7 | 11 | 69.8% | 71.1% | -1.3% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mono White Tokens | 606 | 99.3% | 44.6% |
| Azorius Auras | 58 | 90.6% | 35.6% |
| Selesnya Cage | 38 | 15.0% | 51.7% |
| Orzhov Pixie | 35 | 45.5% | 46.8% |
| Azorius Flash | 30 | 13.3% | 60.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.