Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|
Disrupt ranks #60 out of approximately 5129 cards in raw efficiency (top 1%).
Blue average: 50.3%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Disrupt is an exceptional card that should be considered a format staple.
Recommended number of copies: 4
Performance Efficiency: 0.00 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.4%. Disrupt has a win rate of 75.0%, making it 58.3% better than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dig Through Time | Instant | 7 | 77.5% | 2 |
Witness Protection | Enchantment — Aura | 5 | 75.0% | 2 |
Frost Bite | Snow Instant | 6 | 73.1% | 1 |
Elspeth's Nightmare | Enchantment — Saga | 7 | 73.0% | 3 |
Gitaxian Probe | Sorcery | 6 | 72.5% | 0 |
Emry, Lurker of the Loch | Legendary Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 5 | 70.8% | 2 |
Time Warp | Sorcery | 6 | 68.8% | 3 |
Faithless Looting | Sorcery | 5 | 67.8% | 1 |
Essence Scatter | Instant | 17 | 66.9% | 5 |
Ledger Shredder | Creature — Bird Advisor | 15 | 66.3% | 2 |
Cards that perform better with Disrupt than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Jeskai Oculus | 108 | 14.4% | 43.5% |
Izzet Prowess | 101 | 10.3% | 53.2% |
Azorius Omniscience | 23 | 3.5% | 44.8% |
Dimir Midrange | 20 | 0.9% | 45.4% |
Esper Pixie | 17 | 0.9% | 42.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.