Destroy Evil

Top Performing Decklists

Deck Creator Record Best Finish
Esper Pixie kthanakit26 9-1 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769881
Jeskai Oculus crazymorango 8-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907
Jeskai Oculus darth_vaner 8-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053
Esper Pixie gyrabbit47 7-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765778
Esper Pixie houseofmanamtg 7-2 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765757
Esper Pixie platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Bant Toxic platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Azorius Aggro platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Selesnya Cage platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025
Red Deck Wins platinum-mythic rank player 6-0 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025

Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)

Win Rate Impact
-1.2%
vs average deck
Top Table Win Rate
78.8%
placement-weighted
Meta Trend
+5.3%
recent vs earlier
Sample Size
213
decks
Tournament Results
91
1st place
127
top 8
Average Copies
2.1
per deck

Meta Performance Analysis

Destroy Evil ranks #173 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 43%).

Game Impact Factor
76.63
How much this card influences game outcomes
Color Differential
-0.96%

White average: 74.4%

Performance compared to other White cards

Based on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Destroy Evil is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.

Recommended number of copies: 1

Win Rate Timeline

Card Efficiency Analysis

Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
36.8
Win percentage points per mana invested
Relative Efficiency
0.49x
Compared to average cards of same mana value

Performance Efficiency: 21.94 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)

At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Destroy Evil has a win rate of 73.6%, making it 1.4% worse than other 2-mana cards.

Top Performing Partners

Card Name Type Deck Count Win Rate 1st Places
Unidentified Hovership Artifact — Vehicle 6 76.2% 4
Thundertrap Trainer Creature — Otter Wizard 7 74.9% 3
Bottomless Pool/Locker Room Enchantment — Room // Enchantment — Room 27 74.8% 11
Sunpearl Kirin Creature — Kirin 12 74.7% 7
Novice Inspector Creature — Human Detective 11 73.0% 6
Raise the Past Sorcery 9 73.0% 6
Regal Bunnicorn Creature — Rabbit Unicorn 10 72.9% 6
Warden of the Inner Sky Creature — Human Soldier 10 72.9% 6
Mockingbird Creature — Bird Bard 51 68.8% 21
Sheoldred, the Apocalypse Legendary Creature — Phyrexian Praetor 47 65.7% 13

Card Synergy Analysis

Cards that perform better with Destroy Evil than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.

Card Name Type Mana Decks Win Rate Together Win Rate Apart Synergy Score
Shardmage's Rescue Enchantment — Aura 1 5 88.9% 74.6% +14.2%
Manifold Mouse Creature — Mouse Soldier 2 5 83.9% 73.4% +10.5%
Heartfire Hero Creature — Mouse Soldier 1 5 83.9% 73.5% +10.4%
Emberheart Challenger Creature — Mouse Warrior 2 5 83.9% 73.5% +10.3%
Sunspine Lynx Creature — Elemental Cat 4 7 83.9% 74.8% +9.1%
Monstrous Rage Instant 1 7 81.4% 74.7% +6.7%
Anoint with Affliction Instant 2 9 79.0% 72.7% +6.3%
Floodpits Drowner Creature — Merfolk 2 10 79.4% 73.1% +6.2%
Nesting Bot Artifact Creature — Robot 1 7 84.6% 78.5% +6.1%
Novice Inspector Creature — Human Detective 1 17 80.9% 76.3% +4.6%

Top Archetypes

Archetype Deck Count % of Archetype Win Rate
Esper Pixie 1415 90.6% 54.9%
Jeskai Convoke 500 89.9% 49.2%
Boros Burn 277 70.7% 53.9%
Jeskai Oculus 256 87.4% 52.0%
Red Deck Wins 203 14.7% 51.6%

Statistics Explanation

Statistic Description Formula
Win Rate Impact How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks)
Top Table Win Rate A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight)
Meta Trend Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period)
Confidence Factor A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). log10(Number of decks + 1)
Average Copies The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks)
Card Synergy Score Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates)
Raw Efficiency Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. (Win rate) / (Mana value)
Relative Efficiency How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value)
Performance Efficiency Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value)
Game Impact Factor A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100)
Color Differential How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. Win rate - Average win rate for same color

All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.