Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Azorius Omniscience | takano kantaro | 8-4 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Azorius Omniscience , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Izzet Prowess , Jeskai Oculus
Meta Performance Analysis
Curiosity ranks #483 out of approximately 4236 cards in raw efficiency (top 11%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 52.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Curiosity is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 10.74 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 47.0%. Curiosity has a win rate of 53.7%, making it 14.2% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Devout Decree | Sorcery | 16 | 73.4% | 8 |
| Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 13 | 72.7% | 3 |
| Scavenger Regent | Creature — Dragon | 12 | 68.9% | 3 |
| Mystical Tutor | Instant | 5 | 68.7% | 1 |
| Shore Up | Instant | 7 | 67.1% | 1 |
| Mazemind Tome | Artifact | 22 | 64.9% | 8 |
| Qarsi Revenant | Creature — Vampire | 12 | 64.4% | 2 |
| Nurturing Pixie | Creature — Faerie Rogue | 52 | 63.3% | 19 |
| Swords to Plowshares | Instant | 5 | 63.0% | 0 |
| Chrome Mox | Artifact | 6 | 62.8% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Curiosity than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcane Signet | Artifact | 2 | 7 | 70.6% | 56.7% | +13.9% |
| Sol Ring | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 68.2% | 55.2% | +13.0% |
| Cyclonic Rift | Instant | 2 | 6 | 65.7% | 55.6% | +10.1% |
| Rhystic Study | Enchantment | 3 | 5 | 65.2% | 55.5% | +9.7% |
| Firebrand Archer | Creature — Human Archer | 2 | 5 | 62.5% | 53.4% | +9.1% |
| Swan Song | Instant | 1 | 5 | 65.6% | 59.0% | +6.6% |
| An Offer You Can't Refuse | Instant | 1 | 5 | 60.0% | 56.3% | +3.7% |
| Mental Misstep | Instant | 1 | 8 | 59.4% | 56.7% | +2.7% |
| Abrade | Instant | 2 | 5 | 58.3% | 55.8% | +2.5% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 7 | 56.2% | 54.8% | +1.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 2009 | 86.7% | 50.4% |
| Dimir Bounce | 363 | 69.0% | 44.6% |
| Azorius Flash | 211 | 86.8% | 58.6% |
| Azorius Glyph | 31 | 27.0% | 44.5% |
| Azorius Auras | 21 | 31.8% | 43.6% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.