Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Mono Green Ramp | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Golgari Beanstalk , Mono Green Ramp , Sultai Dragons , Unknown Archetype
Meta Performance Analysis
Bloomvine Regent ranks #373 out of approximately 413 cards in raw efficiency (top 90%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Green average: 65.9%
Performance compared to other Green cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Bloomvine Regent is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 7.04 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 5 mana, the average win rate in the format is 72.1%. Bloomvine Regent has a win rate of 70.4%, making it 2.4% worse than other 5-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ugin, Eye of the Storms | Legendary Planeswalker — Ugin | 6 | 55.8% | 2 |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 7 | 47.9% | 2 |
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 6 | 47.5% | 2 |
| Disruptive Stormbrood | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 47.5% | 1 |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 6 | 37.5% | 1 |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 5 | 37.0% | 1 |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 37.0% | 1 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Bloomvine Regent than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Up the Beanstalk | Enchantment | 2 | 6 | 76.2% | 71.9% | +4.3% |
| Disruptive Stormbrood | Creature — Dragon | 5 | 5 | 63.2% | 63.2% | -0.0% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 7 | 72.0% | 73.2% | -1.2% |
| Ugin, Eye of the Storms | Legendary Planeswalker — Ugin | 7 | 6 | 72.0% | 74.2% | -2.2% |
| Overlord of the Hauntwoods | Enchantment Creature — Avatar Horror | 5 | 5 | 66.7% | 71.6% | -5.0% |
| Ghost Vacuum | Artifact | 1 | 5 | 66.7% | 73.2% | -6.5% |
| Llanowar Elves | Creature — Elf Druid | 1 | 6 | 62.5% | 73.1% | -10.6% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Archetype | 3 | 0.8% | 36.7% |
| Golgari Beanstalk | 2 | 6.7% | 12.5% |
| 1 | 6.2% | 50.0% | |
| Mono Green Ramp | 1 | 33.3% | 100.0% |
| Sultai Dragons | 1 | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.